Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Eicher v. Mid America Financial Investment Corporation
Nos. S-03-1257, S-03-1184 (Neb. Sup. Ct. filed Aug. 22, 2005) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55954
Description
Home Owners Prove Consumer Fraud and Civil Conspiracy Against Lenders Who Misrepresented Home Conveyances as Home Loans
Abstract
The [INSERT COMPLETE COURT NAME] Court held that plaintiff owners
who were fraudulently induced to sign home conveyances were
entitled to recover damages, including attorney fees, for civil
conspiracy claims and state consumer protection law violations.
Plaintiffs filed against Mid America and its owners an action
alleging that owners, acting through Mid America as their alter
ego, conducted a fraudulent scheme whereby they identified people
whose homes were in foreclosure, approached them under the guise of
loaning them money to stop the foreclosure, and then deceitfully
acquired title to their homes by acquiring warranty deeds.
Plaintiffs alleged fraud, civil conspiracy, unjust enrichment, and
violations of the state consumer protection law and deceptive trade
practices law. Defendants contended that the terms of the
transaction were fully explained to each plaintiff and that
plaintiffs understood that they were conveying title to the home to
defendants. The trial court found that defendants had engaged in a
civil conspiracy to commit fraud and had fraudulently induced
plaintiffs to enter into transactions of conveyance falsely
represented as loans in violation of the state consumer protection
act; the trial court awarded plaintiffs $374,224 in attorney fees .
Affirming the trial court, the [INSERT COMPLETE COURT NAME] court
reasoned that, because plaintiffs were fraudulently induced to sign
what was misrepresented as loan documents, the general rule binding
a party to a signed contract did not apply. The basis of
plaintiffs’ action was that they were induced to sign
contract documents based upon the assertions that the documents
were loans when in fact they were conveyances.
Additional Information
Files
- Third amended petition
- Plaintiffs' closing brief
- Order
- Motion for attorneys' fees
- Brief in support of plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees
- Brief of appellants Mid America Financial Investment Corporation, Scott W. Bloemer, and Elena [sic]Hollingshead
- Brief of appellees and brief on cross appeal
- Reply brief of appellants Mid America Financial Investment Corporation, Scott W. Bloemer, and Elena [sic] Hollingshead and answer to brief on cross-appeal
- Brief of appellants Mid America Financial Investment Corporation, Scott W. Bloemer, and Elena [sic] Hollingshead
- Brief of appellees
- Opinion
- Motion for attorneys' fees
