Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Comite de Jornaleros de Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo Beach
No. CV 04-9396-CBM (C.D. Cal. August 8, 2005) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55952
Description
Ninth Circuit Upholds Preliminary Injunction for Plaintiffs Challenging an Anti-Day-Laborer Ordinance
Abstract
In an unpublished memorandum, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the
district court’s preliminary injunction in favor of a local
and a national association of day laborers in the
associations’ suit challenging a city ordinance that
prohibited soliciting employment on the street or stopping a
vehicle to hire someone from the street. Plaintiffs challenged the
ordinance under Section 1983 as violating the First and Fourteenth
Amendments. Prohibiting enforcement of the ordinance during the
suit’s pendency, the district court found that plaintiffs
established standing under Article III and prudential limitations
and that the ordinance was unconstitutionally content-based because
it restricted only solicitation of employment, business, or
contributions but not other types of speech. The district court
questioned whether the ordinance was narrowly tailored to address
the city’s concern about traffic flow, vandalism, littering,
and public urination and whether the ordinance left open
alternative channels of communication. The balance of hardship
favored plaintiffs, who were subject to arrest, fines, and loss of
livelihood so long as the ordinance was in effect, the district
court found. In a brief opinion, the Ninth Circuit held that the
district court did not abuse its discretion.
Additional Information
Files
- Findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Preliminary injunction
- Order declining transfer of Comite de Jornaleros de Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo Beach to U.S. District Judge Otero
- Memorandum
- Order granting in part and denying in part plaintiffs' motion for a protective order
- Plaintiffs' reply brief in support of application for a temporary restraining order and order to show cause re preliminary injunction
- Temporary restraining order and order to show cause re preliminary injunction
