Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Ouedraogo v. Durso Associates
No. 03 CV 1851 (RLC) (S.D.N.Y. June 15, 2005) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55934
Description
Walking Deliverymen Sue Key Food Supermarket Chain for Unpaid Minimum Wage and Overtime
Abstract
On behalf of an opt-in class, five walking deliverymen who worked
at various Key Food stores in New York City are suing the stores
for failing to pay minimum wage and overtime in violation of the
Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Minimum Wage Act.
Plaintiffs allege that defendants hired them through a labor agent
and, as joint employers, had them perform nondelivery tasks as
well, such as moving shopping carts and bagging groceries.
Plaintiffs claim that they normally worked six-day weeks of
forty-eight to seventy hours. They seek the unpaid minimum and
overtime wages, liquidated damages under both statutes, and
attorney fees. Ruling on a motion to dismiss one defendant against
whom only state law claims were filed, the district court held that
plaintiffs pleaded sufficient facts to support a conclusion that
defendant was a joint employer and that supplemental jurisdiction
over the state law claims was appropriate because they were part of
a shared story among the plaintiffs and derived from a common
nucleus of operative fact. The joint-employment claim was
bolstered, the court said, by the court’s summary judgment
ruling in Ansoumana v. Gristedes Operating Corporation, 2555 F.
Supp. 2d 184 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (Clearinghouse No. 52,833), a case
that involved some of the same parties.
