Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
NAACP Inc. v. Summit County
No. 2:05cv378 (D. Utah filed April 25, 2005) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55915
Description
Utah County Faces Class Action Suit on Zoning Policies Allegedly Excluding Moderately Priced, Disabled-Accessible, and Multifamily Housing Developments
Abstract
NAACP, Disabled Rights Action Committee, Utah Coalition of La Raza,
property developers, property owners and other individuals, in a
proposed class action, are suing Summit County, Utah, two planning
commissions, and other officials because their exclusionary zoning
and housing policies allegedly violate plaintiffs’ due
process and equal protection rights under the U.S. Constitution and
violate the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq.
(2000)) and Utah law, including the Utah Moderate Income Housing
Act. Plaintiffs contend that defendants’ land-use, zoning,
and housing polices and practices exclude minorities, persons of
moderate income, the disabled, senior citizens, and persons
receiving government benefits from living in the nondiverse
Snyderville Basin area of Summit County. Plaintiffs allege that
defendants have failed to enact a valid “moderate incoming
housing plan” as required by the Utah Moderate Income Housing
Act. Plaintiff buyers have been prevented from buying moderately
priced, accessible housing, while plaintiff property owners and
developers have been prevented from developing land with moderately
priced, accessible housing in the Snyderville Basin area.
Defendants’ policies, on their face or as applied, severely
restrict multiple-family dwellings, require low-density development
and single-family use and have a disparate and discriminatory
impact, plaintiffs argue. Plaintiffs seek injunctive, declaratory,
and equitable relief, including requiring the encouragement of
moderately priced housing developments and disabled-accessible
housing. They also seek compensatory and punitive damages and costs
and attorney fees.
