Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Ligas v. Maram
No. 05 C 4331 (N.D. Ill. filed July 28, 2005) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55907
Description
Individuals with Developmental Disabilities Sue Illinois Officials for Failing to Provide Community-Based Services
Abstract
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 class action, plaintiffs—nine
Illinois individuals who have developmental disabilities and
qualify for services (including Medicaid services) under
defendants’ system of long-term care for people with
developmental disabilities—are suing defendant state
officials who administer Illinois’s program for such
services. Plaintiffs challenge defendants’ practice of
requiring them to live in large, privately run congregate care
institutions—known as “intermediate care facilities for
people with developmental disabilities”—as a condition
of receiving the long-term care services that they need and for
which they qualify. Plaintiffs maintain that they can appropriately
be served in community-based settings while still meeting their
needs for services and support and that institutionalization causes
them unnecessary regression, deterioration, isolation, and
segregation. In district court, plaintiffs allege violations of the
integration mandates of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities
Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. They further allege
that, in violation of Title XIX of the Social Security Act,
defendants fail to offer a choice between institutional and
community services, fail to provide community services with
“reasonable promptness,” and, by failing to use
effective assessments to determine individuals’ need for
institutional care, cause unnecessary use of intermediate care
facilities for people with developmental disabilities. Plaintiffs
seek declaratory and injunctive relief, class certification, and
payment for attorney fees, litigation expenses, and costs.
