Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Bouley v. Young-Sabourin
No. 03-cv-320 ( D. Vt. June 2, 2005) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55887
Description
Fair Housing Act May Protect Domestic Violence Victim Against Housing Discrimination
Abstract
In this housing discrimination action in which plaintiff tenant, a
domestic violence victim, claimed that defendant landlord evicted
her in violation of the Fair Housing Act of 1968, the district
court found that landlord’s eviction of tenant might
constitute unlawful discrimination in violation of the Act. Tenant,
along with her husband and two children, rented an apartment from
landlord. Tenant’s husband criminally attacked her in the
apartment and subsequently pleaded guilty to assault. Three days
after the attack, landlord gave tenant a written eviction notice
listing the attack as the primary reason for the eviction. Tenant,
alleging that landlord unlawfully terminated her lease on the basis
of sex and religion, claimed that landlord initiated the
termination because tenant was a domestic violence victim and
because tenant refused to listen to landlord’s attempt to
discuss religion with tenant after the incident. The American Civil
Liberties Union’s Women’s Rights Project filed an
amicus curiae brief on tenant’s behalf. The court determined
that if tenant proved these claims, they could constitute unlawful
discrimination under the Act. Applying the burden-shifting
framework of McDonnell-Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973),
to evaluate tenant’s housing discrimination claims, the
district court found undisputedly that, less than seventy-two hours
after tenant’s husband assaulted her, landlord attempted to
evict tenant and that the eviction also might have been prompted by
tenant’s refusal to discuss religion with landlord. The court
also found that landlord, in response, presented little evidence of
preexisting problems with tenant. After the court denied both
parties’ summary judgment motions, the parties stipulated to
dismissal of the action with prejudice.
Additional Information
Files
- Complaint
- Plaintiffs' cross motion for summary judgment and opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment
- Memorandum of law as amicus curiae in support of plaintiffs' motion for and opposition to summary judgment
- Ruling on cross motions for summary judgment
- Stipulation for dismissal and order
