Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
F. v. Lewisburg Area School District Board of School Directors
No. 330 C.D. 2004 (Pa. Commw. Ct. November 12, 2004 ; Clearinghouse Number: 55843
Description
Expulsion Record Properly Expunged Where School Board Lacks Jurisdiction to Expel Student
Abstract
The commonwealth court affirmed the trial court’s expungement
of a student’s expulsion record where appellant school board
lacked jurisdiction to discipline or expel student for drug-related
conduct on school property after school hours. Appellee high school
student and three classmates pooled their money to buy some
marijuana after school hours and off school property. A police
officer observed student and his classmates using the marijuana on
an intermediate school playground at night after a school concert
had ended. The officer arrested and charged them with misdemeanor
drug offenses. Student agreed to a consent decree. The school board
suspended and, after additional hearings, expelled student from
school. Student appealed school board’s expulsion decision to
the trial court. While the appeal was pending, student was
reinstated in school, and he sought to expunge the expulsion from
his record. The trial court reversed school board’s
adjudication, sustained student’s appeal, and directed school
board to expunge student’s expulsion record. On school
board’s appeal, the commonwealth court agreed with the lower
court that school board could not apply school policy on drugs and
alcohol to student because student was not under school
board’s supervision at the time of the incident and that, in
applying the policy, school board exceeded its statutory authority.
The commonwealth court also affirmed the lower court’s
holding that student’s in-school conduct did not establish a
sufficient nexus between the incident and school board’s
supervisory authority.
