Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Balbuena v. IDR Realty LLC
No. 19 (N.Y. Ct. of App. February 21, 2006); Clearinghouse Number: 55834
Description
Immigration Reform and Control Act Preempts State Tort Recovery for Lost Earnings Based on Undocumented Employee’s Potential U.S. Earnings
Abstract
In a companion case to Sanango v. 200 East 16th Street Housing Corporation (Clearinghouse No. 55,833), the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, limited an undocumented worker’s recovery for lost earnings in a tort case to wages that plaintiff, but for his injuries, would have been able to earn in his home country. The court granted third-party defendant management company’s motion for partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiff injured worker’s lost-earnings claim to the extent that the claim sought damages based on wages that plaintiff might have earned illegally in the United States. For an explanation of its reasoning and analysis of the impact of the Immigration Reform and Control Act on state tort law, the court referred to the Sanango decision.
