Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
In re R. K.
No. 84948 (Ohio Ct. App. December 16, 2004), cert. den. Ohio Sup. Ct. May 25, 2005 ; Clearinghouse Number: 55830
Description
Juvenile Court’s Jurisdiction to Maintain Indefinite Driver’s License Suspensions Ends When Offender Turns 21
Abstract
The Ohio Court of Appeals, finding that the juvenile court’s
jurisdiction to maintain indefinite driver’s license
suspensions over appellee ended when appellee reached 21 years of
age, affirmed a juvenile court order restoring appellee’s
right to apply for a driver’s license. While a minor under
18, appellee was found to be a juvenile traffic offender in nine
traffic cases. The juvenile court ordered indefinite suspensions of
appellee’s driving privileges until court costs and fines
were paid in full. After turning 21, appellee, arguing that he was
indigent and that the juvenile court no longer had jurisdiction
over him, moved to vacate the payment of court costs and fines. The
juvenile court denied the motion. Five years later, appellee again
petitioned the juvenile court. The court reversed its earlier
decision and ordered that appellee’s right to apply for an
operator’s license be restored if appellee followed the
procedures and paid reinstatement fees. On appeal, appellant State
of Ohio contended that the juvenile court had continuing
jurisdiction over appellee to enforce its prior orders and require
payment of court costs and fines as a condition for obtaining a
driver’s license even though appellee was over 21.
Disagreeing, the appellate court cited Ohio appellate court
precedent that the juvenile court lacked the authority to revoke a
juvenile’s driver’s license for life and found that the
imposition of indefinite license suspensions where an offender
failed to pay fines and costs was analogous to lifetime suspension.
The appellate court recognized the importance of a valid
driver’s license in today’s society and the impact that
indefinite license suspensions on juveniles had on adults.
