Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Resident Councils of Washington v. Thompson
No. CV 04-1691 (W.D. Wa. filed January 24, 2005) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55820
Description
Claiming Violations of Nursing Home Reform Act and Administrative Procedure Act, Nursing Home Residents Challenge HHS Regulations That Allow “Feeding Assistants”
Abstract
Plaintiffs--a class of residents of federally certified nursing
homes in states that permit nursing homes to employ paid feeding
assistants and organizations advocating on nursing home
residents’ behalf--seek an order to prohibit defendant U.S.
secretary of health and human services from implementing
regulations that create a “feeding assistant” job
category in nursing homes and to direct him to rescind the
regulations. Plaintiffs contend that defendant’s regulations
violate the Nursing Home Reform Act and the Administrative
Procedure Act and that defendant adopted the regulations without a
reasoned explanation or empirical support. Plaintiffs say that a
central provision of the Reform Act, which was passed to address
substandard care in nursing homes receiving Medicare or Medicaid
reimbursement, requires that only licensed health professionals or
certified nurse aides with at least seventy-five hours of initial
training may provide direct care. Plaintiffs contend that, before
the challenged regulations were promulgated, defendant interpreted
feeding assistance as a “nursing-related service” that
the Reform Act prohibited nonnurse aides from performing; in fact,
defendant found states that allowed feeding assistants to be in
violation of the Reform Act. However, plaintiffs say that in 2002
defendant abruptly changed course, citing an alleged shortage of
nurse aides and the experience of states that used feeding
assistants in violation of the Reform Act. Under defendant’s
regulations issued in 2003, nursing homes may hire feeding
assistants with only eight hours of training and no testing or
ongoing evaluation, and more than fifteen states have authorized
their use. They contend that the regulations will diminish the
quality of care they receive and that they will be more likely to
suffer injury or death.
