Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Cagnoli v. Tandem Staffing and Specialty Risk Services Inc.
No. 1D03-5563 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2004) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55811
Description
Florida Law Requiring Social Security Number on Workers’ Compensation Benefit Application Violates Federal Privacy Act
Abstract
The Florida District Court of Appeals found that requiring
applicants for workers’ compensation benefits to include a
social security number on the petition violated the federal Privacy
Act. Claimant challenged a compensation claims judge’s order
striking his petition for failure to include a social security
number. Employment and farmworker rights organizations argued as
amici that the Privacy Act forbade any federal, state, or local
government agency from denying any benefit to an individual for
refusing to disclose a social security number, and the Act imposed
disclosure requirements on any agency requesting social security
numbers. Amici stress that undocumented immigrants explicitly were
eligible for benefits under Florida’s workers’
compensation law, and the claims processing rule regarding social
security numbers undermined the intent of the law. The appellate
court found that the Privacy Act’s exception for record
systems in place before 1975 did not apply because the relevant
section of Florida’s workers’ compensation law was
enacted in 1980. The court directed that claimant’s petition
be reinstated.
