Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Cubas v. Pataki
No. 04/112371 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. New York County filed May 10, 2005) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55764
Description
New York State’s Refusal to Renew Drivers’ Licenses Deprives Immigrants of Property Right, Constitutes Irreparable Harm
Abstract
Granting plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining
order, the court enjoined defendant state officials from denying
renewal of plaintiffs’ drivers’ licenses on the basis
of plaintiffs’ failure to comply with Department of Motor
Vehicles rules that, plaintiffs allege, defendants adopted
illegally. Plaintiffs—New York State residents who have been
or will be denied drivers’ licenses or identification cards
because they are unable to produce an acceptable social security
number or otherwise document their legal immigration status to
defendants’ satisfaction—contend that defendants have
no statutory authority for their policy of requiring a social
security number or proof of lawful immigration status, that the
policy violates the state administrative procedure act, and that it
deprives plaintiffs of their rights to due process and equal
protection. The court said that plaintiffs had established a
likelihood of success on the merits of their claim and that
plaintiffs, who had acquired property rights in their continued use
of their licenses, faced immediate, irreparable harm if the court
did not issue a temporary restraining order. The harm to plaintiffs
outweighed the administrative inconvenience to defendants of
discontinuing their practice of refusing driver’s license
renewals to individuals who could not present adequate social
security numbers or otherwise satisfy defendants’
requirements. However, the court found that, pending a preliminary
injunction hearing, individuals who had not yet been issued
drivers’ licenses would not suffer irreparable harm from
defendants’ policies because this group had not yet acquired
a property interest in the licenses. Similarly those who had
inaccurate or no social security numbers on file with defendants
and whose licenses had not expired or were not about to expire
faced no immediate and irreparable harm.
Additional Information
Files
- Complaint
- Amended class action verified complaint
- Order
- Memorandum of law in support of plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction
- Affirmation of Foster S. Maer in support of plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction
- Order to show cause as to application for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order
- Intermin order
- Interim order
- Defendants' memorandum of law in support of their cross-motion to dismiss and in oppostion to a preliminary injunction
- Plaintiffs' reply brief in support of their motion for a preliminary injunction and in opposition to defendants' cross-motion to dismiss
- Amended Decision and Order
