Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
US v. Fair Plaza Assoc.
No. CIV 02-1181 WJ/ACT (D. N.M. filed, Feb. 5, 2004) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55582
Description
New Mexico Apartment Owners and Managers Agree to Pay Damages to Plaintiffs Who Alleged Racial and Familial-Status Discrimination
Abstract
The district court entered a consent order in a case charging that
defendant owners and managers of several apartment complexes in
Albuquerque, New Mexico, discriminated against prospective tenants
on the basis of race and familial status, in violation of the Fair
Housing Act. Plaintiff United States and individuals who sought
apartments alleged that defendants on several occasions told one
prospective tenant that they would let him rent an apartment for
himself but that his young child could not live with him because
defendants did not rent to people with children. Plaintiff alleged
that defendants rented an apartment in a different complex to a
white tenant who said his fiancée would be moving to
Albuquerque to join him; that the property manager first told the
tenant that the fiancée could move in provided that she also
signed the rental agreement; but that when the manager saw the
fiancée, an African American, manager told the tenant that
double rent would be charged and then gave him notice to vacate. In
both instances, fair housing testers confirmed defendants’
discriminatory policies. The consent order enjoined defendants from
discriminating on the basis of race or familial status; the order
also directed them to adopt and implement written nondiscriminatory
procedures for handling rental inquiries and applications, maintain
records of inquiries, maintain waiting lists for apartments,
refrain from restricting occupancy based on familial status (apart
from imposing an occupancy limit of three persons for each
one-bedroom apartment), undergo fair housing training, notify
current tenants of the order, pay plaintiff-intervenors amounts
ranging from $2,000 to $10,000, establish and publicize an $85,000
account to compensate other aggrieved persons, pay $4,000 to New
Mexico Legal Aid’s Fair Housing Center, and pay a $10,000
civil penalty.
