Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Gaddis v. Campbell
301 F. Supp.2d 1310 (M.D. Ala. 2004) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55578
Description
Class Action Settlement Agreement Requires Alabama Department of Corrections to Provide Diabetic Prison Inmates with Appropriate Medical Care and Treatment
Abstract
Plaintiff Alabama prison inmates with diabetes reached a settlement
agreement with the Alabama Department of Corrections over their
class action lawsuit alleging that defendant violated the Eighth
and Fourteenth Amendments by failing to provide plaintiffs with
adequate medical care. The settlement agreement requires defendant
to (1) develop written policies and procedures incorporating the
settlement agreement for the care of diabetic inmates; (2) screen
inmates; (3) give continuing care and treatment; and (4) educate
diabetic inmates. The agreement specifies a contract monitor who
will ensure compliance and report to plaintiffs’ counsel. The
settlement agreement is not a consent decree enforceable in federal
court but may be enforced through state court action. Plaintiffs
are not precluded from bringing a new federal action.
