Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Nat'l Senior Citizens Law Cen. v. U.S. DHHS
No. 1:04-cv-00226-ESH (D. D.C. filed, Feb. 2004) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55577
Description
National Senior Citizens Law Center Asks District Court to Order CMS to Respond to Request for Records Under Freedom of Information Act
Abstract
Plaintiff National Senior Citizens Law Center filed in federal
court a complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Plaintiff alleges that
defendant violated the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §
552, by failing to respond to plaintiff’s request for agency
records. Plaintiff alleges that defendant adopted a regulation that
changed its long-standing interpretation of federal law (42 U.S.C.
§§ 1395i-3(b)(5)(F), 1396r(b)(5)(f)) requiring nursing or
“nursing-related” work in nursing facilities to be
performed by licensed health professionals or certified nurse
aides. The new regulation allows nursing facilities to employ
“single-task workers” trained to perform only one
function, such as feeding residents. Plaintiff alleges that, by a
letter to CMS dated August 12, 2003, plaintiff sought documents
related to nursing facilities’ use of single-task workers and
that, despite four follow-up telephone calls and a follow-up letter
in January 2004, defendant has failed to respond.
