Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Garcia v. Cal. Polytechnic State Univ.
No. (Cal. Super. Ct. San Luis Obispo County filed, Jan. 6, 2004) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55575
Description
California State University Admissions Policy That Relies on Test Scores and Grants Geographical Preferences Violates State Law, Latino Students Allege
Abstract
Plaintiff applicants to California Polytechnic State University at
San Luis Obispo, a taxpayer, and a community organization filed
their complaint asking for declaratory and injunctive relief
against defendant state university. Plaintiffs allege that
defendant evaluates applicants according to a rigid mathematical
formula that includes SAT I or ACT scores as a prominent component
and that this policy has a disparate impact on Latino applicants,
who score significantly lower on the tests than whites and Asian
Americans. Plaintiffs also allege that defendant grants a
geographic “point bonus” to applicants who live in the
part of the state that defendant considers its “service
area” and that whites are overrepresented in this area in
relation to their overall population in the state, while Latinos,
Asian Americans, and African Americans are underrepresented.
Individual plaintiffs all allege that they graduated near the top
of their high school classes but that defendant denied them
admission due to its discriminatory policies. Plaintiffs contend
that defendant’s admission policies violate California
Government Code Section 11135, which prohibits discrimination in
state programs.
