Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
C & A Financial Programs, Inc. v. Elliott
No. 03-139-CA (Fla. Cir. Ct. Martin County filed, July 23, 2003) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55449
Description
In Collection Action for Loan Secured by Military Pension, Defendant Counters with Truth-in-Lending Act and Consumer Protection Law Violations
Abstract
Borrower is defending and counterclaiming in a collection action
for a loan secured by defendant’s military retirement
benefits. Defendant alleges that he sought to borrow $15,000 from
plaintiff after giving plaintiff information about his retirement
status, rank, and pay grade upon retirement. Of the $15,000 loan,
defendant alleges that he received only $12,569. He alleges that
plaintiff claimed both ownership and a security interest in his
military retirement benefits, charged usurious interest, illegally
tried to bind his heirs, and threatened criminal sanctions under
the loan agreement for failure to repay. Defendant says that
plaintiff received his loan payments directly from the U.S.
Department of Defense. As affirmative defenses, defendant asserts
failure of condition precedent based on his receipt of only $12,569
and plaintiff’s failure to pay full consideration for the
“purchase” of his retirement benefits; usurious
interest; failure to make required disclosures in violation of the
Truth-in-Lending Act and Florida consumer protection and unfair
trade practices acts; illegal assignment of veterans’
benefits; unjust enrichment; and the equitable doctrine of unclean
hands. Defendant’s counterclaims include violation of the
Truth-in-Lending Act, usury, and violation of Florida’s
unfair trade practices act.
