Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Padilla v. Martinez
752 N.Y.S.2d 28 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55139
Description
Termination of Tenancy Is Annulled Because Housing Authority Exploited Unrepresented Tenant’s Mental Incapacity
Abstract
The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, annulled
termination of a tenancy because tenant was incapable of
representing herself, and housing authority, exploiting her mental
incapacity, rendered the termination of tenancy proceedings
manifestly unfair. Housing authority served tenant with a notice
commencing termination of tenancy proceedings for nondesirability
and charging that she assaulted a housing manager. Tenant, who
received Supplemental Security Income due to a learning disability,
appeared unrepresented at the hearing. The hearing officer
recommended termination of tenancy. On appeal, tenant alleged that
housing authority failed to follow federally mandated procedures,
her due process rights were violated, and the termination decision
was unsupported by substantial evidence and constituted a
disproportionate penalty. The court concluded that the hearing
officer’s decision relied heavily on unsupported findings.
The court also found that housing authority, by asking improper
questions and using improperly obtained testimony, took advantage
of tenant’s inability to represent herself. Housing authority
procedure required the hearing officer to adjourn the hearing and
refer tenant for evaluation if tenant appeared incapable of
adequately defending her rights and was unrepresented during a
hearing. Concluding that the termination failed to comport with
basic tenets of due process and housing authority’s own
procedures, the court remanded the matter for a new hearing.
