Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Nwaokolo v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv.
314 F.3d 303 (7th Cir. 2002) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55125
Description
Seventh Circuit Grants Stay of Removal Pending Review Based on Threat of Genital Mutilation to Petitioner’s Daughter
Abstract
The Seventh Circuit found merit in petitioner’s claim that
the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) wrongfully failed
to consider that petitioner’s four-year-old U.S. citizen
daughter would be subject to genital mutilation if she accompanied
her mother to Nigeria. Petitioner first entered the United States
on an F-2 visa but was ordered deported after accepting employment
in violation of visa terms. Petitioner did not depart. In a third
motion to reopen her case petitioner sought protection under the
Convention Against Torture; petitioner claimed that she and her
then 13-year-old U.S. citizen daughter would be subject to genital
mutilation if she were deported. INS denied the third motion on the
ground that petitioner offered no evidence that she would be
tortured. In a fourth motion to reopen, petitioner reasserted her
claim under the convention but added, as changed circumstances, the
threat to her second daughter, not yet born at the time of the
third petition, and new protections and remedies under the
convention. Without discussing the second daughter, the Bureau of
Immigration Appeals denied the motion. Petitioner appealed. The
Seventh Circuit, finding that petitioner demonstrated a likelihood
of success on her claim of INS abusing its discretion in denying
the motion to reopen, said that INS failed to consider State
Department reports on female genital mutilation in Nigeria and
erroneously equated the threats to the first and second daughters,
despite INS recognition of the serious threat of genital mutilation
in In re Kasinga, 21 I. & N. Dec. 357, 361–62
(BIA 1996). The Seventh Circuit stayed the removal proceeding
pending review.
