Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Lowther v. Lowther (In re Lowther)
No. 01-6359 (10th Cir. Dec. 31, 2002) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55116
Description
Court-Ordered Attorney Fees Are Dischargeable If Obligation Adversely Affects Custodial Parent's Ability to Support Child, Tenth Circuit Rules
Abstract
The Tenth Circuit held that when a custodial parent’s
financial condition and the custody relationship were such that her
obligation to pay court-ordered attorney fees would adversely
affect her ability to support her child financially, the facts
constituted “unusual circumstances” warranting a narrow
exception to the general rule of nondischargeability. When
defendant-appellee mother divorced plaintiff-appellant father, the
state court granted mother custody of their child and required her
to pay father $9,000 in attorney fees. Mother later filed a
bankruptcy petition seeking to discharge, among other debts, the
$9,000 in fees. Father sought to have the fees deemed
nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5), classifying
alimony and other support payments as nondischargeable. The
bankruptcy court held that the fees were nondischargeable.
Reversing the court, the bankruptcy appellate panel held the fees
to be dischargeable; it stated that “if a parent’s
income is so insubstantial that the obligation to pay
attorney’s fees will clearly affect the parent’s
ability to financially support the child for a significant
duration, that would present an unusual circumstance under”
In re Jones, 9 F.3d 878 (10th Cir. 1993). Affirming the
panel’s decision, the Tenth Circuit noted that unusual
circumstances most likely to warrant an exception were those where
discharge was in the child’s best interests. Here the Tenth
Circuit found that requiring mother to pay the $9,000 payment would
negate for at least five years the support payments that the state
court awarded.
