Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Birdsong v. Perdue
No. 1:03-CV-0288-JEC (N.D. Ga. filed, Jan. 31, 2003) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55112
Description
Persons with Disabilities Challenge Georgia's Failure to Provide Long-Term Health Care Services in Their Homes and Communities
Abstract
Plaintiffs filed their class action complaint challenging Georgia
Department of Human Resources' policies and procedures that
cause them to be unnecessarily segregated in nursing homes or at
risk of nursing home placement. Plaintiffs, persons who have
physical disabilities and receive or are seeking to receive
long-term health care services under Medicaid, allege that
defendants discriminate against them by violating the integration
mandate of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Plaintiffs
assert that (1) the most integrated setting for them in which to
receive long-term health care services is in their homes and
communities; (2) defendants do not offer appropriate services to
plaintiffs in their homes and communities but continue to provide
plaintiffs with services only in nursing homes, which are
unnecessarily segregated settings; (3) among states with waiver
programs, Georgia ranks close to the bottom in the percentage of
Medicaid participants being served in community-based programs
rather than in institutions; (4), in operating the home and
community-based waiver programs, defendants utilize criteria and
methods of administration that discriminate against plaintiffs and
defeat or substantially impair the objectives of the waiver
programs, in violation of the ADA and Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act; and (5) defendants violate Title XIX by failing
to provide benefits to plaintiffs with reasonable promptness, to
inform plaintiffs adequately of the waiver alternatives, and to
allow plaintiffs a choice of institutional or home and
community-based services. Plaintiffs seek costs, attorney fees, and
declaratory and injunctive relief requiring defendants to offer
their long-term care services immediately to plaintiffs in their
homes and communities.
