Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Liesegang v. Sec'y of Veterans Affairs
312 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2002) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55096
Description
Federal Circuit Rules That Effective Date of Regulation Creating Presumption of Service Connection Is Date of Publication in Federal Register
Abstract
The Federal Circuit held that the effective date of a U.S.
Department of Veterans Affairs regulation creating a presumption of
service connection benefits for Vietnam veterans who developed
Type-2 diabetes was the date of publication in the Federal
Register. After department promulgated the disputed regulation
as required by the Agent Orange Act of 1991, the Federal
Register published the final rule on May 8, 2001, with an
effective date of July 9, 2001. Petitioners, three honorably
discharged veterans who served in Vietnam and suffered from Type-2
diabetes, contended that department, misconstruing the Act,
erroneously assigned a later effective date to the final rule. The
Federal Circuit, noting that Congress unambiguously decreed in the
Agent Orange Act that “[s]uch regulations shall be effective
on the date of issuance,” found that the department had to
give effect to Congress’ clear intent. Notwithstanding that
provision, department argued that, in light of the Congressional
Review Act, the rule “take[s] effect” on the later of
sixty days after Congress receives department’s report about
the rule or the rule’s publication in the Federal
Register. Holding that department misconstrued Congress’
intent, the court found that department erroneously assumed that
the term “take effect” under the Congressional Review
Act equated to the term “effective date” in the Agent
Orange Act, thereby overruling the Agent Orange Act’s
provision. The court concluded that the Congressional Review Act
affected the regulation’s operative date only, not its
effective date.
