Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Munshi v. Wilson-Coker
No. CV-02-0821467-S (Ct. Super. Ct. Hartford County filed, Nov. 20, 2002) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55093
Description
Immigrant Applicants for State Medical Assistance Challenge Connecticut’s Deeming of Sponsor’s Income and Assets
Abstract
Plaintiffs, two legal immigrants with grave medical needs, are
challenging the Connecticut department of social services’
deeming of their sponsor’s and his spouse’s income and
assets to them, thereby rendering them ineligible for state-funded
medical assistance. Plaintiffs’ son signed an affidavit of
support for the immigrant visa petition that he filed on his
parents’ (plaintiffs’) behalf. After immigrating to the
United States, son’s father suffered a cranial aneurysm. He
needed immediate brain surgery and long-term extensive professional
care. Department’s commissioner applied deeming regulations,
found that plaintiffs were over income and over asset, and denied
their applications for state medical assistance for noncitizens. A
hearing officer upheld the denial. Suing commissioner, plaintiffs
allege that, because Connecticut’s legislature did not
exercise its option under the Personal Responsibility and Work
Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 to require sponsor-deeming
as a condition of participation in the state medical program,
commissioner acted without statutory authority in propounding the
deeming regulations and applying them to plaintiffs to deprive them
of necessary medical assistance. They also allege that
commissioner’s denial of state medical benefits solely based
on immigration status violates the equal protection clause of the
state constitution and of federal constitution as made actionable
by 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and
injunctive relief and attorney fees and costs.
