Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Taylor v. Vt. Dep't of Educ.
313 F.3d 768 (2d Cir. 2002) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55081
Description
Noncustodial Parent May Access Her Child’s Educational Records Under IDEA, Says Second Circuit
Abstract
The Second Circuit held that plaintiff had an individual right to
record access under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
(IDEA) but not under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act
(FERPA). Plaintiff noncustodial parent sought to compel defendant
school district to give her an independent evaluation and access to
her daughter’s educational records. Plaintiff alleged that
defendant’s failure to do so violated her rights under both
Acts’ record-access provisions. Pursuant to a divorce decree,
family court had awarded full custody to the child’s father.
The district court had ruled that, as a noncustodial parent,
plaintiff lacked standing to sue under both Acts. On
plaintiff’s appeal, the Ninth Circuit barred
plaintiff’s FERPA claim because FERPA did not create an
individual right enforceable under Section 1983. The Ninth Circuit
reasoned that the statutory language did not express congressional
intent to create a private right of action. Also, since domestic
relations fell within the traditional sphere of state authority,
the Ninth Circuit found that plaintiff lacked standing to challenge
the appropriateness of her child’s individualized education
program evaluation under IDEA. However, the Ninth Circuit ruled
that plaintiff should be allowed to pursue her record-access claim
under IDEA because the custody decree had not revoked her
informational-access prerogatives.
