Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Wallace v. Chicago Housing Authority
No. 03 C 0491 (N.D. Ill. June 2, 2005) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55072
Description
Chicago Housing Authority and Housing Advocates Settle Lawsuit over Resident Relocation
Abstract
The parties settled this action challenging public housing
residents’ displacement from public housing into
high-poverty, segregated neighborhoods. Plaintiffs had alleged that
defendant Chicago Housing Authority (CHA) had a policy and practice
of not providing adequate relocation services or providing
relocation services that steered plaintiffs into racially and
economically segregated neighborhoods. The parties agreed to two
relocation programs for current and former CHA residents: (1)
CHA’s current relocation program, encouraging moves to
racially integrated areas of metropolitan Chicago and providing for
case-managed social services, would be applied to families
initially moving from public housing; and (2) an agreed-upon
modified program run by CHA’s voucher administrator, CHAC
Inc., would encourage former CHA residents to relocate to
economically and racially integrated communities as well as give
them increased access to social services. While CHA would have
discretion to change existing or future programs, that discretion
would be subject to its commitment to use “best reasonable
efforts” in helping class members move to economically and
racially integrated neighborhoods. Plaintiffs’ counsel would
have ongoing access to information regarding relocation and social
service programs for public housing families. Although the case
would be voluntarily dismissed as a result of the settlement,
plaintiffs would retain the right to reinstate the lawsuit within
three years of the effective date of the settlement if they
believed that CHA was breaching the agreement.
Additional Information
Files
- Complaint
- First amended complaint
- Plaintiffs' memorandum in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss
- Memorandum opinion and order
- Answer to first amended complaint
- Plaintiffs' motion to reconsider section I of memorandum opinion and order
- Defendants' memorandum in opposition to plaintiffs' motion
- Plaintiffs' reply brief
- Order
- Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement
- Settlement Agreement and Order
- Preliminary Approval Order
- Notice of Hearing on Proposed Settlement of Class Action Lawsuit
- Settlement Agreement and Order
- Protective Order
