Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Chung v. New Silver Palace Rest., Inc.
No. 00 CIV. 7353 (AKH) (S.D. N.Y. Sept. 13, 2002) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55050
Description
Restaurant Employer’s Tip-Sharing Arrangement Is Illegal Under Fair Labor Standards Act
Abstract
The district court held that defendant restaurant owner’s
practice of decreasing the minimum hourly wage paid to restaurant
waiters who were being forced to share their tips with management
was unlawful under Section 3(m) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (29
U.S.C. § 203(m)) and Section 196–d of the New York State
Labor Law. Plaintiff waiters sued to recover tips that they were
forced to share with management and for damages under various
federal and state labor laws. The dispute between restaurant
employees and management began in 1995, when the union representing
waiters and busboys at the old Silver Palace Restaurant challenged
the legality of the tip-pooling arrangement there. Then the state
court ruled that because employees shared tips with, among others,
the restaurant’s general manager and several part owners, the
sharing arrangement violated state law. With the opening of the New
Silver Palace, its management instituted the same tip-pooling
arrangement; management, commonly called ‘black
jackets,” shared in the waiters’ tip pool. Finding
forced tip sharing illegal under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the
district court said that Congress did not intend to allow an
employer to take both the tip credit and share in the
employees’ tips. The court also said that state law clearly
prohibited from sharing tips part-owner employees who, like the
black jackets, wielded broad managerial authority and were clearly
the “employers.” The court granted plaintiffs partial
summary judgment and reserved the issue of damages for further
proceedings.
