Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
George v. Contra Costa County Employment and Human Servs.
No. (N.D. Cal. filed, Nov. 18, 2002) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55030
Description
Native American Challenges California County Agency’s Income Verification Policy for Its Public Benefits Programs
Abstract
Plaintiff homeless and jobless pregnant woman of Native American
descent challenges a California county agency’s income
verification policy for determining eligibility for its public
benefits. When plaintiff applied for benefits, she indicated that
she was “American Indian” and that she did not receive
or expect to receive any Native American funds. A caseworker
informed plaintiff that, because she had “potentially
available income” to which she was “apparently
eligible,” her application was not allowed to be approved
until she applied for tribal benefits and informed county. Although
county retroactively granted plaintiff’s application after
she requested membership in and aid from one Sioux tribe, plaintiff
is suing defendant county employment and human services agency, its
director, county, and its officials. She argues that defendants not
only sought a statutorily unauthorized potential source of income
from her but also did so in a discriminatory manner. She maintains
that, despite her sworn statements to the contrary, defendants
unreasonably and negligently assumed that tribal income was
available and that they required her, based solely on her Native
American ancestry, to apply for tribal funds as a condition of
eligibility for cash assistance and food stamps without giving her
any tribal contact information. Plaintiff alleges that defendants
violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; 42 U.S.C. §
1983; 7 U.S.C. § 2020 (administration of the Food Stamp
Program); her right to equal protection and due process under the
Fourteenth Amendment; and the California constitution and statutes.
