Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Cardenas v. Anzai
311 F.3d 929 (9th Cir. 2002) ; Clearinghouse Number: 55019
Description
Medicaid, but Not Eleventh Amendment Bars Medicaid Recipients’ Claim to Tobacco Settlement “Overage”, Ninth Circuit Rules
Abstract
The Ninth Circuit ruled that the Eleventh Amendment did not bar
Hawaii Medicaid recipients with smoking-related illnesses from
recovering the “overage” portion of their state’s
allocation of the 1998 tobacco settlement; however, the Ninth
Circuit held that plaintiffs’ recovery was precluded by a
1999 amendment to the Medicaid statute, 42 U.S.C. §
1396b(d)(3)(B)(ii), which allowed use of tobacco settlement funds
“for any expenditures deemed appropriate by the State.”
Hawaii was one of forty-six states that entered with tobacco
companies into a settlement under which the states received
reimbursement for Medicaid expenditures and other smoking-related
costs; the Hawaii legislature directed allocation of the funds. In
their suit, plaintiffs alleged that 42 U.S.C. § 1396k(b)
required the state to distribute to Medicaid recipients any
settlement funds above the state’s actual expenditures. The
district court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss on
Eleventh Amendment grounds, and plaintiffs appealed. Analyzing U.S.
Supreme Court decisions in Ex Parte Young and its progeny
regarding prospective versus retrospective relief, the Ninth
Circuit concluded that plaintiffs were seeking to remedy “a
present and ongoing violation of federal law,” not to
establish past state liability. Since plaintiffs sought only
prospective relief, the Eleventh Amendment did not bar their
claims. The Ninth Circuit, however, affirmed its right to uphold
the decision below on any ground supported by the record. It held
that the 1999 amendment to the Medicaid statute carved out an
exception to the more general statute governing distribution of
Medicaid funds recovered from a legally liable third party. The
plain language of 42 U.S.C. § 1396b(d)(3)(B)(ii), said the
Ninth Circuit, barred plaintiffs’ claims to any portion of
the tobacco settlement funds.
