Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Avila v. Dep't of Motor Vehicles
No. 02CS00617 (Cal. Super. Ct. Sacramento County, filed May 2, 2002) ; Clearinghouse Number: 54838
Description
Immigrants Seek Enforcement of California Law Allowing Individuals Without Social Security Numbers to Obtain Drivers’ Licenses
Abstract
Plaintiffs have filed their complaint in this action challenging
the California Department of Motor Vehicles’ (DMV’s)
failure to implement Assembly Bill No. 60 of the 2001-02
legislative session, which provides that individuals without social
security numbers may obtain drivers’ licenses. Under A.B. 60,
if an applicant signs an affidavit under penalty of perjury
attesting that he or she does not possess a social security number
and submits a federal taxpayer identification number, the
submission of those documents shall be acceptable to the DMV in
lieu of a social security number until the applicant obtains a
social security number. Plaintiffs allege that A.B. 60 addresses a
critical safety issue in California because it enables immigrants
who are in the process of becoming legal residents to apply for
drivers’ licenses. Plaintiffs assert that, in the face of
repeated calls by concerned citizens and community advocates that
A.B. 60 be implemented, state officials have refused to recognize
that A.B. 60 is a statute. A.B. 60 was passed by the California
Assembly on September 14, 2001, and enrolled and presented to the
governor on October 2, 2001. Subsequently, the Chief Clerk of the
Assembly retrieved the bill from the governor’s desk and
returned it to the legislature. Plaintiffs claim the Chief Clerk
had no authority to recall the bill from the governor’s desk
after it had been enrolled and presented. Plaintiffs assert that,
because the legislature did not recall A.B. 60, and the Chief Clerk
lacked the authority to recall the bill, its presentment to the
governor was never withdrawn, and the bill became law 30 days after
its presentment. Plaintiffs seek a writ of mandate directing the
DMV to execute the provisions of A.B. 60, a declaration that A.B.
60 is the law, and permanent injunctive relief requiring the DMV to
enforce the law.
