Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Garcia v. Warring
No. 01-9078 (Mass. Super. Ct. Hampden County Aug. 1, 2002) ; Clearinghouse Number: 54834
Description
Medicaid Recipient Entitled to Reimbursement for Personal Care Attendant Services Provided by Her Daughter
Abstract
The court has held that plaintiff is entitled to Medicaid
reimbursement for personal care assistance provided by her
daughter. Plaintiff is a 74-year-old woman who has been diagnosed
with psychosis and dementia. Defendant Massachusetts Division of
Medical Assistance approved plaintiff for 44 hours per week of
services from a personal care attendant on April 12, 2000, and
increased the approval one year later to 56 hours per week plus two
hours of care per night. In May 2000, after an adult day camp and
five or six different care givers were unable to provide plaintiff
the daily care she required, plaintiff’s daughter quit her
job to act as plaintiff’s personal care attendant. In March
2001, defendant informed plaintiff that it would no longer
reimburse her for personal care attendant services provided by her
daughter. Plaintiff appealed, arguing that defendant’s
decision was based on an error of law and arbitrary and capricious
in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and
section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. The court found that,
although plaintiff is entitled to personal care attendant services,
she has been denied those services because her disability prevents
anyone other than her daughter to care for her. The court held that
defendant’s refusal to grant a waiver of its regulations,
which prohibit family members from providing personal care
attendant services, violated the ADA. Accordingly, the court
ordered defendant to restore personal care attendant payments to
plaintiff for services provided by her daughter retroactive to
March 2001 and to continue such payments for as long as plaintiff
remains eligible for such services.
