Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Burger v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review
No. 81 WAP 2001 (Pa. Sup. Ct. July 16, 2002) ; Clearinghouse Number: 54801
Description
Unemployment Compensation Claimant Fired for Off-the-Job Drug Use Is Not Ineligible for Benefits Based on Misconduct
Abstract
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that an unemployment
compensation claimant who was fired for off-the-job drug use is
eligible for benefits. Plaintiff was employed as a nurse’s
aide at a nursing home. After plaintiff was treated for a workplace
injury, employer’s physician sent employer her medical
history, which indicated that plaintiff regularly used illegally
obtained prescription medications and marijuana. When questioned by
her employer, plaintiff admitted that she used marijuana every
evening, but claimed that she did not report to work under the
influence; she denied using prescription drugs illegally. Employer
fired plaintiff because of her drug use. Plaintiff’s claim
for unemployment compensation was denied, and she appealed. The
referee found that nothing in the record established that any of
claimant’s admitted drug use, or non-admitted drug use,
affected her work performance. Nonetheless, the referee held that
plaintiff was ineligible for benefits based on willful misconduct.
Affirming, the trial court found that claimant was at fault for her
unemployment because her admitted conduct was inconsistent with
acceptable standards of behavior. Reversing, the supreme court held
that, although employer was justified in terminating plaintiff, the
conclusion that plaintiff’s off-the-job drug use constitutes
misconduct was unsupported. Noting that neither the referee nor the
Unemployment Compensation Board of Review found that
plaintiff’s conduct affected her work, the court held that
the trial court’s erred in finding that plaintiff
“could have harmed patients” and “might attempt
to work in a sufficiently impaired condition.”
