Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Nicholson v. Scoppetta
No. 113 (N.Y. Ct. App. Oct. 26, 2004) ; Clearinghouse Number: 54616
Description
Allegation That Child Witnessed Domestic Violence Is Insufficient to Find Caretaker Parent Neglectful
Abstract
The New York Court of Appeals held that an allegation that a child
witnessed domestic violence was not sufficient to conclude that the
child had been neglected by the child’s caretaker parent.
Plaintiffs alleged that defendant child protection agency routinely
charged mothers who had been victims of domestic violence with
neglect and removed their children because, as victims, the mothers
failed to protect their children from exposure to domestic
violence. The federal district court held that defendant’s
practices violated the substantive due process rights of mothers
and children not to be separated by the government unless the
parent was unfit to care for the child; defendant’s practices
also violated procedural due process rights. On defendant’s
appeal, the Second Circuit found that the resolution of uncertain
issues of New York statutory law would avoid, or modify, the
federal constitutional issues presented. To the New York Court of
Appeals the Second Circuit certified three questions. The New York
Court of Appeals found that a party seeking to establish neglect
must show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that (1) the
child’s physical, mental, or emotional condition had been
impaired or was in danger of becoming impaired and (2) the actual
or threatened harm to the child was a consequence of the failure of
the parent or caregiver to exercise a minimum degree of care in
providing the child with proper supervision or guardianship. The
court held that, when the sole allegation was that the mother had
been abused and the child witnessed the abuse, the child was not
deemed neglected under the statute. The court noted that its ruling
should not be interpreted to mean that a child could never be
“neglected” when living in a household plagued by
domestic violence. Neglect might be found where, for example,
children had been exposed to extremely violent conduct between
their parents, several times requiring official intervention, and
where caseworkers testified to the children’s fear and
distress resulting from their long exposure to such violence.
Additional Information
Files
- Order
- Fourth amended class action complaint
- Plaintiffs' post-trial memorandum of law
- Amended memorandum, order and preliminary injunction
- Supplemental memorandum, findings of fact and law, and order
- Appellants' brief
- Brief of defendants/appellants
- Brief of subclass A, plaintiffs/appellees
- Brief of Amicus Curiae
- Opinion
- Opinion
