Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Brooklyn Legal Services Corporation B v. Legal Services Corporation (Dobbins v. Legal Services Corporation, Velazquez v. Legal Services Corporation)
Nos. 05-0340-cv(L), 05-0360-cv(Con), 05-0787-cv(Con), 05-0792-cv(Con), 05-0928-cv(XAP) (U.S. filed March 28, 2007); Clearinghouse Number: 54348
Description
LSC-Funded Plaintiffs Argue In Writ of Certiorari That LSC’s “Physical Separation” Requirement Violates the First Amendment And Further That 2nd Circuit’s Decision Contravenes Supreme Court’s "Unconstitutional Burdens" Doctrine
Abstract
The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari October 1, 2007.
Additional Information
Files
- Complaint
- Memorandum in support of plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction
- Memorandum of law in opposition to motion for preliminary injunction
- Memorandum of law in opposition to motion for preliminary injunction and in support of motion to dismiss
- Amici curiae brief in support of motion for preliminary injunction
- Amici curiae brief in support of plaintiffs
- Memorandum of law in support of motion to dismiss
- Plaintiffs' reply memorandum
- Memorandum of law of intervenor-defendant in reply to plaintiffs' memorandum of law
- Supplemental memorandum of law
- Reply memorandum of law
- Memorandum and Order
- Brief for intervenor-appellant United States of America
- Brief for plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellants and plaintiff-cross-appellants
- Brief of amici curiae The National Legal Aid & Defender Association; The National Organization of Legal Services Workers, UAW Local 2320, AFL-CIO; The Atlanta Legal Aid Society, Inc.; The Association of Virginia Legal Aid Programs; California Rural Legal Assistance, Inc.; The Empire Justice Center; Friends of Farmworkers, Inc.; Inland Counties Legal Services; The Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles; Legal Aid of North Carolina, Inc.; The Legal Assistance Foundation of Metropolitan Chicago; Legal Services Corporation of Virginia; Legal Services of Greater Miami, Inc.; Legal Services of Northern California, Inc.; Legal Services of South Piedmont; The Nassau Suffolk Law Services Committee; Neighborhood Legal Services of Eastern New York; Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County; New Mexico Legal Aid, Inc.; Northwest Justice Project
- Brief for amici curiae Council on Foundations, Inc., Independent Sector, AARP Foundation, Alabama Giving, Alliance For Justice, American Cancer Society, Bernard F. & Alva B. Gimbel Foundation, Center For Lobbying In The Public Interest, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Nathan Cummings Foundation, National Committee For Responsive Philanthropy, National Council of Non-Profit Associations, Nonprofit Coordinating Committee of New York, OMB Watch, The Open Society Institute, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and Other Non-Profit Organizations and Charitable Organizations and Foundations Supporting Plaintiffs
- Brief of amicus curiae Association of the Bar of the City of New York et al., in support of plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellants and plaintiff-cross-appellants
- Brief for amicus curiae National Association of IOLTA Programs
- Reply/cross-appellee's brief for intervenor-appellant United States of America
- Reply/cross-appellee's brief of defendant-appellant-cross-appellee
- Opinion
- Petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc
- Petition for Writ of Certiorari
