Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Houle v. Quenneville
787 A.2d 1258 (Vt. Sup. Ct. 2001) ; Clearinghouse Number: 54344
Description
Landlord Not Required to Serve Housing Authority with Notice of Nonrenewal of Section 8 Lease
Abstract
The Vermont Supreme Court affirmed the decision that the
parties’ Section 8 lease did not require contemporaneous
service of a notice of nonrenewal on Vermont State Housing
Authority. After defendant-appellant tenants threatened to withhold
rent unless repairs were made, plaintiff-appellee landlord
commenced an eviction action alleging that tenants violated their
Section 8 lease. When the lease expired during the pendency of the
eviction, landlord served tenants with a notice of nonrenewal, and
the court awarded landlord possession based on expiration of the
lease. On appeal, tenants argued that the lease required service of
the notice of nonrenewal on the housing authority when an owner
evicted tenants for any reason. Finding that the lease
distinguished between termination of the tenancy during the lease
term and termination at the end of the lease term, the state high
court held that service on the housing authority was required only
when the tenancy was terminated for good cause during the lease
term. The court also held that the retaliatory eviction defense was
available in nonrenewal cases; however, the court found that
tenants had not met their burden of proving the nonrenewal to be
defendant-appellee retaliatory.
