Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
In re Parker, Brattleboro Hous. Auth. v. Parker
269 B.R. 522 (D. Vt. 2001) ; Clearinghouse Number: 54340
Description
Payment of Prepetition Attorney Fees, Utility and Repair Charges Not Required for Assumption of Public Housing Lease as Part of Chapter 13 Plan
Abstract
Affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s grant of
debtor-appellee’s motion to assume her public housing lease,
the district court did not require her to pay various utility and
repair charges and prebankruptcy attorney fees as a condition of
assumption. Debtor-appellee, a public housing resident who had
fallen behind in her rental payments, filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy
petition, which stayed her eviction. After converting to a Chapter
13 case, debtor-appellee filed a motion to assume her residential
lease, which the Bankruptcy Court conditioned on payment of the
prebankruptcy rent arrearage and court costs. Creditor-appellant
appealed, claiming that assumption should have been conditioned on
repayment of all debtor-appellee’s debts to it, including
prebankruptcy attorney fees and various utility and repair charges.
Reviewing de novo, the district court interpreted the fee-shifting
provision in the lease narrowly. The district court found that,
because a public housing lease was a contract of adhesion and
because U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
regulations prohibited the automatic imposition of attorney fees
regardless of outcome, the fee-shifting provision applied only
where a final judgment entered against a tenant. The court further
found that utility and repair charges did not constitute unpaid
rent for purposes of cure and assumption.
