Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Douglas v. California Dep't of Youth Auth.
271 F.3d 812 (9th Cir. 2001) ; Clearinghouse Number: 54300
Description
Ninth Circuit Holds That by Receiving Rehabilitation Act Funds California Waives Sovereign Immunity to Section 504 Claims
Abstract
Reversing the district court’s summary judgment for
defendant-appellee, the Ninth Circuit held that California waived
sovereign immunity to claims under Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act by accepting Rehabilitation Act funds
defendant-appellee. Defendant-appellee California Department of
Youth Authority denied plaintiff-appellant’s application for
employment because he failed a mandatory color vision test. After
the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued a
“cause finding,” plaintiff-appellant filed in district
court a suit alleging violations of Title I of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
defendant-appellee and seeking damages and injunctive relief. The
district court granted summary judgment for plaintiff-appellant on
both claims. On appeal, defendant-appellee asserted Eleventh
amendment immunity for the first time in light of the Supreme
Court’s recent holding in Board of Trustees of the
University of Alabama v. Garrett (Clearinghouse No. 52744)
that the Eleventh Amendment bars ADA Title I claims for money
damages against states. Because California had accepted
Rehabilitation Act funds, the Ninth Circuit held that it waived its
sovereign immunity under the Rehabilitation Act. Finding that a
state might also waive immunity from ADA Title I claims, the Ninth
Circuit remanded the case to the district court to determine if
defendant-appellee had done so.
