Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
United States v. C.B.M. Group, Incorporated
No. 01-857-PA (D. Or. Nov. 5, 2001); Clearinghouse Number: 53895
Description
Landlord Agrees to Cease "Zero-Tolerance" Policy Under Which It Attempted to Evict Victim of Domestic Violence
Abstract
The parties settled in this action challenging defendant landlord's and property manager's policy of evicting domestic violence survivors from their homes because of domestic violence incidents. Plaintiff is a tenant in a federally subsidized apartment complex. Plaintiff's husband physically assaulted her, and she obtained a temporary restraining order against him. After receiving a copy of the restraining order, defendants served her with a twenty-four-hour notice to vacate her apartment because of the domestic violence incident. Defendants subsequently refused plaintiff's attempts to pay rent and denied her application
to rent a smaller apartment. Plaintiff alleged that defendants' policy of terminating the tenancy of or refusing to rent an apartment to domestic violence victims, most of whom are women, because of domestic violence incidents constituted discrimination on the basis of sex in violation of the Fair Housing
Act, 42 U.S.C. ยง 3604. Defendants agreed no longer to apply its "zero-tolerance" policy of evicting innocent victims of violence. Defendants also agreed to amend its manuals, train all staff, and post notices to tenants in all of their properties in Oregon, California, Arizona, Nevada, and Hawaii.
