Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Allende v. Turner
No. 400195/00 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Apr. 6, 2001) ; Clearinghouse Number: 53856
Description
Issue of Giving Untimely Assistance and Accommodation to Mentally Disabled Persons Is Not Moot
Abstract
The court found that the issues of giving timely assistance and
accommodation to mentally disabled persons and failing to
promulgate and follow, in accordance with the American with
Disabilities Act, policies and procedures for disabled persons
applying for protective services and public assistance were not
moot and denied dismissal of those claims. Petitioner, a mentally
disabled mother of two minor children, lived in a rent-stabilized
apartment with a monthly rent of $368.40 and received monthly
Supplemental Security Income benefits of $523. Although her
children were eligible for public assistance, they were not
receiving it because petitioner could not manage the application
process. When petitioner fell behind in her rent payments, her
landlord evicted her; with legal assistance, she regained
possession upon signing a stipulation to pay rent arrears. Suing
state and local officials, petitioner challenged the nearly
three-month delay before respondents began to give her any
subsistence benefits and services. She alleged violations of the
Americans with Disabilities Act, Rehabilitation Act, state
constitution, state laws and regulations, and administrative
directives and procedures. Finding the action moot as to
petitioner’s claims that respondents failed to assist her in
applying for public assistance for her children and failed to give
her funds to pay rent arrears, the court dismissed those claims.
However, the court agreed with petitioner that city
respondents’ failure to provide timely assistance and
accommodations to disabled persons who risked eviction was an
exception to the mootness doctrine. The court explained that
respondents’ conduct was capable of repetition yet repeatedly
evaded review.
Additional Information
Files
- Order to Show Cause
- Petitioner's Memo of Law in Support of Pet'n and in Support of Application for Temp. Restr. Order
- Notice of State Respondents' Cross-Motion to Dismiss
- Petitioner's Notice of Cross-Motion
- Affirmation in Opp'n to Motion to Dismiss
- Petitioner's Memo of Law in Reply and in Further Opp'n to Respondents' Cross-Motion to Dismiss
- Affirmation in Further Support of Cross-Motion to Dismiss and in Opp'n to Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Amend
- State Respondents' Reply Memo of Law in Further Support of Cross-Motion to Dismiss
- Respondents Memo of Law in Further Support of their Cross-Motion to Dismiss and in Opp'n to Motion for Leave to Amend
- Decision and Order
