Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Williams v. Office of Personnel Management
NY-0831-99-0431-I-1 (Merit Sys. Protection Bd. NY Field Office Nov. 22, 1999) ; Clearinghouse Number: 53046
Description
Widow Established by Preponderant Evidence That Decedent Had Not Received Timely Notice of Election Rights for Survivor Annuity Benefits
Abstract
The Merit Systems Protection Board awarded survivor annuity
benefits to appellant on the basis of her deceased husband’s
service. The husband had elected reduced annuity benefits in order
to provide his first wife with survivor benefits should he
predecease her. Upon the first wife’s death, Office of
Personnel Management eliminated the reduction in the annuity.
Decedent married appellant, and, upon his death, appellant filed
for survivor annuity benefits. Her request was denied because
decedent had not filed a second written election of reduced
annuity. Appellant, contending that decedent had never received
notice of the time limit for electing a survivor annuity benefit,
requested reconsideration; Office of Personnel Management affirmed
its original decision, but the Merit Systems Protection Board
reversed it. The board noted that when an appellant made a
“nonfrivolous assertion” of lack of notice, the burden
shifted to Office of Personnel Management to show that it complied
with notice requirements. Although Office of Personnel Management
offered probative evidence that all annuitants were sent proper
notice at relevant times, appellant testified that she received
decedent’s mail and maintained household records and never
saw notice of the election requirement. She also presented an array
of witnesses, all of whom testified that the decedent spoke often
of his belief that she would receive his pension in the event of
his death. Based on appellant’s credibility and the
corroborating testimony, the board found that appellant had
supplied preponderant evidence successfully rebutting the evidence
presented by Office of Personnel Management.
