Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Olesky v. Haveman
5:99cv-105 (W.D. Mich. May 2, 2000) ; Clearinghouse Number: 53007
Description
Nursing Home Residents with Mental Disabilities Challenge Michigan’s Failure to Offer Appropriate Community Placements
Abstract
The district court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss this
class action complaint alleging that defendant Michigan Department
of Community Health and its officials fail to place plaintiff
nursing home residents in appropriate community settings.
Plaintiffs are six named persons with mental disabilities and
Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service. The individual plaintiffs
and the class they seek to represent were evaluated as not needing
nursing facility services but requiring specialized or mental
health services. Plaintiffs allege that, in violation of the
Nursing Home Reform Act, defendants do not provide for the safe and
orderly discharge of class members into community settings and do
not provide specialized mental health services in such settings.
They allege that defendants violate the mandate of the Americans
with Disabilities Act to administer their services “in the
most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of qualified
individuals with disabilities.” Defendants have not provided
mental health services in integrated community settings; rather
plaintiffs remain unnecessarily confined to nursing facilities
where they receive minimal mental health services. Plaintiffs
allege state law violations and seek mandamus, declaratory, and
injunctive relief. The court also held plaintiffs’ motion for
class certification in abeyance pending discovery.
