Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Dajour B. v. City of New York
(S.D. N.Y. filed Mar. 17, 2000) ; Clearinghouse Number: 53005
Description
Homeless Children with Asthma Claim That New York City and State Officials Denied Them Essential Medical Treatment
Abstract
In a class action against defendant New York City and state agency
officials, plaintiff homeless New York City children who suffer
from asthma allege that defendants failed to inform them and their
families of the availability of early and periodic screening,
diagnosis, and medical treatment (EPSDT) as mandated by title XIX
of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S. C. §§ 1396 et
seq. (Medicaid Act). Plaintiffs assert that, according to a
recent study, nearly 40 percent of children residing in the
city’s shelter system suffer from asthma, and 90 percent of
homeless children with persistent asthma are not receiving adequate
medical treatment. They allege that Medicaid is designed to ensure
that poor people receive necessary medical services and that
federal law requires participating states to provide EPSDT for
Medicaid-eligible children under age 21. State regulations require
city defendants to conduct outreach initiatives and to inform all
households with eligible children of the availability of medical
services and support services. Plaintiffs claim that, for many
homeless families entering the city’s emergency shelter
system, city officials in violation of these regulations do not
inform families of the availability of EPSDT and fail to screen
for, diagnose, and treat asthma. Plaintiffs allege that state
defendants violated the Medicaid Act by failing to supervise city
defendants adequately to ensure that they provide the mandated
EPSDT services. In addition to claiming a violation of Section
1983, plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief, cost, and
attorney fees.
