Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Make the Road by Walking, Inc. v. Turner
No. 02-7876 (2d Cir. August 4, 2004); Clearinghouse Number: 52902
Description
Court Denies Defense Request for Advocacy Organization's Unredacted Schedules, Performance Evaluations, Task Sheets, and Political Letters
Abstract
The district court denied defendant New York City Human Resources Administration’s request for unredacted production of the schedules, performance evaluations, weekly support evaluations, and task sheets of three employees of a welfare advocacy organization and letters the organization sent to local politicians concerning defendant. Plaintiffs—the organization as well as welfare applicants and recipients—sued to enjoin city from refusing advocates access to Income Support and Job Center waiting rooms; they claimed that city’s policy was unconstitutional. At discovery, plaintiffs produced redacted documents about public benefits training and organizing that staff attended or conducted and documents indicating that staff visited centers. Plaintiffs
claimed the redacted portions were irrelevant and were protected by the constitutional rights of association, of speech, and to petition government. Defendant claimed that the task sheets, schedules, and evaluations were relevant because, among other reasons, they would show the kind of activities the organization would undertake in the centers if given access. The court held that the produced schedules and task sheets were sufficient, and the
request for performance evaluations and political letters was unduly intrusive. The court said that the requested
discovery’s relevance was disproportionate to its annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, burden, and expense.
Additional Information
Files
- Complaint
- Memorandum and Order
- Plaintiffs' memorandum in support of motion for summary judgment
- Plaintiffs' memorandum of law in reply to defendant's opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment
- Plaintiffs' memorandum of law in opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment
- Brief for plaintiff-appellant Make The Road By Walking
- Reply brief for plaintiff-appellant Make The Road By Walking
- Opinion
