Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Regional Management Corp. v. Legal Servs. Corp.
186 F.3d 457 (4th Cir. 1999). ; Clearinghouse Number: 52563
Description
Fourth Circuit Holds That Legal Services Corporation Decisions on Lobbying Violations Are Not Subject to Judicial Review
Abstract
The Fourth Circuit held that the decision of Legal Services
Corporation (LSC) that LSC funding recipients did not lobby
illegally was not subject to judicial review. Plaintiff-appellees
are lenders to people who have poor credit histories or are
otherwise high credit risks. In its complaint with LSC, plaintiff
alleged that, through their lobbying activities against plaintiff,
certain recipients of LSC funds violated 42 U.S.C. §
2996f(a)(5), the LSC Act’s ban on lobbying federal, state, or
local officials. LSC concluded that recipients’ lobbying did
not violate the LSC Act, and plaintiff sought judicial review.
Concluding that it had jurisdiction to hear the challenge to
LSC’s decision, the district court ruled on the merits of the
alleged violations. On appeal, LSC argued that the district court
should not have reached the merits of the dispute because judicial
review of LSC’s decision had no legal basis. The Fourth
Circuit held that judicial review of LSC’s decision was not
available under the Administrative Procedure Act because the
Administrative Procedure Act’s judicial review provisions
applied only to actions by a federal agency, and the LSC Act did
not provide that LSC be considered an "agency" for
resolution of complaints alleging lobbying violations under 42
U.S.C. § 2996f(a)(5). Further, the LSC Act did not provide for
plaintiff’s explicit private right of action to challenge
LSC’s decision, nor did Congress intend to create an implied
private right of action.
