Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Meachem v. Wing
No. 99 Civ. 4630 (PKC) (S.D. N.Y. April 20, 2005) ; Clearinghouse Number: 52561
Description
Parties Settle Challenge to Fair Hearing System; New York Will Train Hearing Officers on Proof-of-Mailing Issues
Abstract
The parties settled this federal class action lawsuit in which
plaintiffs claimed that New York’s fair hearing system
violated federal statutes and regulations and the due process
clause. Plaintiffs requested fair hearings to challenge reduction
or termination of benefits for failure to respond to a mailed
appointment notice or eligibility questionnaire; they alleged that
when they claimed not to have received the mailing, hearing
officers treated affidavits of mailing from agency officials as
conclusive proof without determining the affidavits’
sufficiency or allowing plaintiffs the opportunity to rebut the
presumption of mailing and receiving the affidavits. The settlement
agreement certified a plaintiff class of persons who (1) received
public assistance, food stamps, or Medicaid from New York City, (2)
were subject to benefit reduction or termination due to failure to
respond to a letter or other mailing, and (3) challenged the
reduction or termination on the grounds of not receiving either the
mailing to which defendants claimed that plaintiffs failed to
respond or the notice of intent to reduce or discontinue benefits.
Under the agreement, defendant state officials will train all New
York City hearing officers through a module promoting “the
goal of assuring the provision of due process of law at Fair
Hearings of Class Members.” For three consecutive six-month
periods, defendants will designate a tracking code to identify
hearing decisions involving class members and “Meachem-type
appellants” and give plaintiffs’ counsel a list
identifying those fair hearings and a copy of the full hearing
records of a random sample of 500 cases from the list. Defendants
will give plaintiffs’ counsel the full hearing records of a
random sample of 100 cases not designated with the code. Defendants
will pay plaintiffs’ counsel $1,300,000 in attorney fees.
