Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Concerned Residents of ABLA v. Chicago Housing Authority
No. 99C 4959 (N.D. Ill. filed July 29, 1999).; Clearinghouse Number: 52441
Description
Tenants’ Suit Alleges That Planned Public Housing Redevelopment Would Force Out African Americans
Abstract
Tenants of the Addams, Brooks, Loomis and Abbott (ABLA) public housing development in Chicago filed a class action discrimination lawsuit against the Chicago Housing Authority (CHA) and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Plaintiffs seek to block HUD-approved CHA plans to demolish approximately 3,000 very low-income ABLA housing units and replacing them with fewer than 660 units. More than 1,500 families, virtually all African American, would be displaced under the plan, and their displacement would perpetuate patterns of racial segregation. Plaintiffs claim that the redevelopment plan will reduce by 70 percent housing for very low-income families and that the loss will be borne overwhelmingly by female-headed African American households and children under 18; they allege violations of the Fair Housing Act and Title VI of the federal Civil Rights Act. Plaintiffs claim that the National Housing Act protects public housing units from demolition until redevelopment plans are negotiated in consultation with all tenants affected by the demolition and that all displaced tenants must be offered replacement housing of their choice and receive assistance from the public housing agency in finding and retaining decent and affordable replacement housing, including housing at the redeveloped site if practicable. Plaintiffs allege that certain relocation rights guaranteed them under the Uniform Relocation Act and the Housing and Community Development Act were also violated. See also Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority/Concerned Residents of ABLA v. Chicago Housing Authority, Cl. No. 1969.
