Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Honore v. Florida State Bd. of Educ
(Fla. Cir. Ct. Leon County filed Jan. 1999). ; Clearinghouse Number: 52268
Description
Students Seek to Enforce Florida Supreme Court Decision That State Constitution Entitles Public School Children to an Adequate Education
Abstract
Plaintiffs—civil rights, community, and advocacy
organizations and 1,400,000 minority schoolchildren from poor
communities attending allegedly inadequate public schools in
Florida—seek declaratory, injunctive, and supplemental relief
against defendant Florida state board of education to enforce the
Florida Supreme Court decision Coalition for Adequacy and Fairness
in School Funding Inc. v. Chiles, 680 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 1996). Most
of the schools attended by plaintiff schoolchildren are schools in
which the majority are poor. Plaintiffs claim that each school
attended by them fails to teach basic skills in reading, writing,
and mathematics. Under the Coalition decision a cause of action
exists to enforce article IX, section 1, of the Florida
Constitution, which provides that the state’s children are
constitutionally entitled to an "adequate" education when
the state’s public school system fails to provide for a
literate, knowledgeable population. They argue that defendants
violated this constitutional guarantee to the extent that they
permitted and continue to permit inadequate schools that result in
a substantial number of students who do not achieve functional
literacy. Plaintiffs also cite state statute for the proposition
that basic educational goals require at least the development of
functional literacy in reading, mathematics, writing, and other
subject matters and a recent voter-adopted mandate, which
reinforces and enhances article IX, section 1, to read, in part,
that "[i]t is . . . a paramount duty of the state to make
adequate provision for the education of all children residing
within its borders."
Additional Information
Files
No files available.
