Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v. City of Cleveland,
Nos. 95-3665/4016 (6th Cir. Feb. 3, 1997) ; Clearinghouse Number: 52217
Description
Cleveland Ordinance Requiring Peddlers to Pay $50 License Fee Does Not Unduly Restrain Peddlers’ First Amendment Rights
Abstract
Reversing, the Sixth Circuit has granted defendant city’s
motion for summary judgment in this action challenging a city
ordinance that requires all peddlers to pay a $50 license fee.
Plaintiffs had alleged that the ordinance violated their rights to
free speech under the state and federal constitutions. Granting
plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, the district court
concluded that the fee constituted an impermissible prior restraint
on speech. Subsequently, the court awarded plaintiffs $15,628 in
attorney fees. City appealed. The court of appeals held that an
ordinance requiring a person to pay a license or permit fee before
engaging in a constitutionally protected activity does not violate
the Constitution so long as the purpose of charging the fee is
limited to defraying expenses incurred in furtherance of a
legitimate state interest. The court also held that a more than
nominal permit fee is constitutionally permissible so long as the
fee is reasonably related to the expenses incident to the
administration of the ordinance and to the maintenance of public
safety and order. Finding that Cleveland’s peddler’s
ordinance and the license fee it imposes are narrowly tailored to
further a legitimate governmental interest because the licensing
program helps to prevent fraud by solicitors and that the fee is
reasonable related to the costs of administering the ordinance, the
court held that the fee does not unduly or impermissibly burden
plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights.
