Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Olmstead v. L.C.
95-1210 (N.D. Ga. July 11, 2000); 119 S. Ct. 2176 (1999) ; Clearinghouse Number: 52203
Description
Consent Order Provides Community-Based Placements and Services for Plaintiffs on Remand from Supreme Court
Abstract
The parties settled this case on remand from the U.S. Supreme
Court, and the district court issued a consent order by which
plaintiffs are to receive community-based placements and services
and $672,000 for attorney fees and costs. In Olmstead v. L.C., 119
S. Ct. 2176 (1999), the Supreme Court held that states must place
persons with mental disabilities in community settings when the
state’s treatment professionals determined that community
placement was appropriate, the transfer to a less restrictive
setting was not opposed by the affected individual, and the
placement could be reasonably accommodated, taking into account the
state’s resources and the needs of others with mental
disabilities. Plaintiff-respondents—individuals with mental
disabilities—claimed that defendant-petitioner state
officials violated the Americans with Disabilities Act by failing
to place them in community-based treatment as deemed appropriate by
treating professionals. Holding that undue institutionalization
qualified as discrimination “by reason of . . .
disability” in violation of the Act, the Court remanded the
case for further consideration of appropriate relief, given
states’ facilities for persons with diverse mental
disabilities and their obligation to administer services equitably.
In the consent order, defendants agreed to maintain plaintiffs in
their current community-based residential placements and continue
community-based services so long as the settings remained
appropriate to their needs, plaintiffs met financial requirements,
and the legislature appropriated funds for institutional or
community placements and services for any mentally disabled person.
Defendants also agreed that trained and experienced professionals
would develop individualized service plans for plaintiffs and that
plaintiffs might actively participate in the plan development. The
agreement does not preclude necessary facility treatment, but
community services and placement must be restored within a
reasonable time.
Additional Information
Files
- Opinion
- Brief for respondents
- Amici curiae brief of ADAPT, National Council on Independent Living, and TASH in support of respondents
- Amici curiae brief of National Mental Health Consumers' Self-Help Clearinghouse, et al., in support of respondents
- Brief of amicus curiae, Dick Thornburgh and the National Organization on Disability in support of respondents
- Amicus curiae brief of 58 former state commissioners and directors of mental health an developmental disabilities, et al. in support of respondents
- Brief for the United States as amicus curiae supporting respondents
- Brief for amici curiae American Association on Mental Retardation, et al., in support of respondents
- Brief amici curiae for the American Psychiatric Association and the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill supporting respondents
- Brief of amici curiae, American Civil Liberties Union and ACLU of Georgia in support of respondents
- Brief of amicus curiae, Self-Advocates Becoming Empowered, People First of Georgia, Autism National Committee, National Down Syndrome Congress and Vision for Equality
- Brief amicus curiae of the National Council on Disability in support of respondents
- Opinion
- Consent Order
