Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Chemberlin v. Chater
No. 95-1162-Civ-Orl-19 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 29, 1996). ; Clearinghouse Number: 51597
Description
Case Remanded to Determine If Disabled Claimant Who Worked Part-Time Is Eligible for Special SSI Cash Benefits
Abstract
Upon judicial review of the decision of the Social Security
Administration (SSA) to terminate plaintiff’s disability
benefits under the SSI program for engaging in substantial gainful
activity (SGA), the district court has remanded to the commissioner
to issue a fully favorable decision and to determine whether
plaintiff is eligible to receive special SSI benefits under section
1619(a) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1382(h).
Plaintiff received SSI and disability benefits because of anxiety,
impaired vision, and other problems. She earned from $700 to $800
per month for more than a year working part-time as a customer
service representative for large retailers. The administrative law
judge (ALJ) found that claimant’s entitlement to disability
and SSI benefits was terminated (although her disabling condition
had not improved) because of her SGA. The ALJ waived the resulting
overpayments. The ALJ did not address plaintiff’s continuing
entitlement to "special" SSI cash benefits under section
1619(a), although she argued that her earnings, after exclusion of
the first $85 plus 50 percent of the remainder, left her entitled
to a small SSI cash benefit. The Appeals Council found no basis for
review. The district court ordered that all of the ALJ’s
findings and conclusions be adopted except for the cessation of the
claimant’s SSI benefits due to her SGA; remanded under
sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for a revised, fully
favorable decision; and asked "the effectuating
component" of SSA to consider for the first-time
plaintiff’s continuing entitlement to special SSI cash
benefits. Counsel notes that SSA stipulated to this order.
