Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
In re C.M.
(Wash. Office of Admin. Hearings for the Employment Sec. Dep’t Aug. 16, 1996) ; Clearinghouse Number: 51592
Description
Claimant Was Disabled by the Effects of Long-Term Domestic Violence and Therefore Had Good Cause to Quit Employment
Abstract
On remand from the superior court, the administrative law judge has
held that domestic abuse was a "disability" necessitating
claimant’s voluntary quit and she was therefore eligible for
unemployment benefits. Claimant’s husband repeatedly stalked
her and left threatening messages at her workplace. After he
threatened her with serious bodily harm during Thanksgiving week,
she quit her job and relocated to another state. The Employment
Security Department found that she was without good cause to leave
her employment and denied her claim for unemployment benefits. She
appealed. The trial court rejected claimant’s argument that
the domestic violence she suffered was work-connected. However, the
trial court remanded the case to the Employment Security Department
to make a finding of whether the domestic violence and harassment
claimant suffered at her workplace was of such a nature as to be
"disabling." On remand, the administrative law judge held
that, at the time that she quit, claimant was disabled due to the
effects of long-term domestic violence. Noting that claimant took
her final drastic action only after years of abuse, failed
counseling, and other attempts to find support and remedy through
support groups, family, friends, law enforcement, and the justice
system, the administrative law judge held that claimant had
established good cause for her voluntary quit.
